Why Legislators are such Protectionists: the Role of Majoritarian Voting in Setting Tariffs

نویسندگان

  • Gerald Willmann
  • Roberto Perotti
  • Giovanni Facchini
  • Peter Neary
  • Horst Raff
چکیده

Based on the observation that industries are often geographically concentrated, this paper proposes a new political economy model of trade. We associate the sectors of a specific factors model with electoral districts populated by continua of heterogeneous voters who differ in their relative factor endowments. We show how strategic delegation leads each district to elect a representative who is more protectionist than her median voter. The government formed by a randomly selected subset of representatives sets tariffs that are on average strictly positive. Introducing additional policy instruments reveals a trade-off between efficiency and regional targetability. This paper was inspired by a talk Roberto Perotti gave at Kiel. It was written while the author was visiting the Department of Economics at Stanford University whom I thank for its hospitality. I’m grateful to Giovanni Facchini, Peter Neary, Horst Raff, and Daniel Sturm for helpful comments and discussions. The usual caveat applies: all errors are mine.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Why Legislators are Protectionists: The Role of Majoritarian Voting in Setting Tariffs

Based on the observation that industries are often geographically concentrated, this paper proposes a new political economy model of trade protection. We associate the sectors of a specific factors model with electoral districts populated by continua of heterogeneous voters who differ in their relative factor endowments. We show how strategic delegation leads each district to elect a representa...

متن کامل

Hybrid Political Institutions and Governability: The Budgetary Process in Brazil

In this paper we take a close look at some of the particular pathways by which majoritarian and consensual institutions affect governability. We demonstrate that the mix of majoritarian and consensual institutions found within a country can influence these pathways quite dramatically, such that they produce rather different consequences for governability, even when these pathways are relatively...

متن کامل

Strategic and Non-policy Voting: A Coalitional Analysis of Israeli Electoral Reform

I examine why a majority of Israel’s legislators voted for direct election of the prime minister, reforming the electoral system that vested them with power. The analysis incorporates coalitional politics, strategic voting, and voter preferences over non-policy issues such as candidate charisma. The model generates novel hypotheses that are tested against empirical evidence. It explains five em...

متن کامل

A Carrot and Stick Approach to Agenda-Setting∗

This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how he can exploit a legislature (completely) in the first period by promising future benefits to legislators who support him. In equilibrium, a large majority of legislators vote for the firstperiod proposal because they thereby maintain the chance of belonging to the minimum winning coalition in th...

متن کامل

Should Indians Pay more for Renewable Energy Based Electricity? - The Need for Evidence Based Consumer Tariffs for Electricity in India

India seeks to achieve 175 Giga-Watt (GW) of Renewable power by 2022. As of December 2017, out of 333 GW of total installed capacity of electricity, close to 62GW come from renewable sources. Meeting the set targets calls for augmentation of renewable energy based capacities as expeditiously as possible. However, the sick financial health of the distribution companies/utilities, who act a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002